Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is the "they laughed at Galieo" Gambit http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Galileo_gambit It's a lot older than your examples and is a reliable crutch for quacks.

Yes, most important advances are initially dismissed. But almost all things that are initially dismissed are not important advances. You cannot infer importance from initial dismissal. Dismissal does not in itself make anything more likely to be important.



Indeed. The only thing this proves is that people are really, really bad at determining what things are going to catch on and which aren't.

Which is why I take such "Feh! Bitcoin is a fad!" statements as the uninformed nonsense that they are.


The only thing this proves is that people are really, really bad at determining what things are going to catch on and which aren't.

No, it really doesn't. It just proves that in some particular cases, some particular people were bad at determining that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: