Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That interview mostly went awry. Nate Silver is a brilliant statistician, not a politician. He's no more able to guess the mindset of Appalachian racists 3 years from now than anyone else.


Yea, as I was reading it, more than once I caught myself saying, "Nate, stick with what you know."

OTOH, a brilliant statistician achieves enough success to be noticed by a mainstream "least common denominator" interviewer. How else could it turn out?


I wouldn't call any journalist associated with the Economist a "least common denominator".




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: