Your landlord can't, because the video is your property. A copy on Google's servers isn't, even if you retain the copyright.
In any case, none of these are proper analogies. Google is providing you with a service, not holding stuff for you, and they're simply cutting people who have no contract with them except for their own ToS off.
In any case, none of these are proper analogies. Google is providing you with a service, not holding stuff for you, and they're simply cutting people who have no contract with them except for their own ToS off.