Past 99%, what does "more accurate" mean? I think it will vary from person to person and use case to use case, which is why I personally don't foresee a world where an LLM or any form of AI/ML is ever perfectly accurate.
I'm struggling to think of any medium that has ever reached 100% accuracy, so to target that for an ML algorithm seems foolhardy
I agree with this. Because it does seem that if it's based on NOT 100% accurate information in terms of training, it can never return 100% accurate results. Which I guess, as humans, we don't either, but as a committee, one MAY argue we could. I'm torn lol.
I'm struggling to think of any medium that has ever reached 100% accuracy, so to target that for an ML algorithm seems foolhardy