It certainly isn’t *needed*, but got has nice advantages even for solo work, let... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

mikeash on July 8, 2018 | parent | context | favorite | on: Version Control Before Git with CVS

It certainly isn’t needed, but got has nice advantages even for solo work, let alone small teams.

mooreds on July 8, 2018 [–]

Sure, and now git is well enough known to be a good default. But if the choice is no version control or CVS, I'll pick CVS. (If the choice is no version control or RCS, I'll pick RCS, too.)

Note that I realize that you didn't argue for no version control.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact