Extraordinary claims require bullet proof evidence, I don't see that here, just a bunch of pretty pictures that could be a whole pile of other things than 'reproducing particles'.
And if they do, they might simply be extremophiles, see above. Something isn't 'normal earth life' because you say so, something isn't earth life because you show it to reproduce (not because you say so) and because you prove that after you've conclusively proven that it indeed does reproduce does not contain any of our normal DNA, which should be fairly trivial.
Then you make samples available for each and every lab in the world that wants a slice of they pie by reproducing your results.
Research in isolation tends to produce un-reproducible results, the guy that did the original research is heavily involved in this effort so it does not count as any confirmation of the earlier claims.
Remember: Pons, Fleischmann, Percival Lowell, Hwang Woo-suk and many many others.
And if they do, they might simply be extremophiles, see above. Something isn't 'normal earth life' because you say so, something isn't earth life because you show it to reproduce (not because you say so) and because you prove that after you've conclusively proven that it indeed does reproduce does not contain any of our normal DNA, which should be fairly trivial.
Then you make samples available for each and every lab in the world that wants a slice of they pie by reproducing your results.
Research in isolation tends to produce un-reproducible results, the guy that did the original research is heavily involved in this effort so it does not count as any confirmation of the earlier claims.
Remember: Pons, Fleischmann, Percival Lowell, Hwang Woo-suk and many many others.